What Is Samādhi? — Understanding the Deeper State of Yoga

Samādhi is often described as absorption, deep meditation or complete inner stillness. But these words do not yet tell us what actually changes when meditation becomes samādhi.

One way to understand it is through attention, effort and tension.

At the beginning of meditation, concentration requires effort. Attention moves away and has to be brought back. The body demands attention, the senses respond to what is happening around us, thoughts appear, and subtle reactions continue within the mind.

As concentration develops, attention becomes increasingly one-pointed. It moves less and eventually reaches a point where it can remain steadily with the object of meditation.

Then something important begins to change.

You no longer have to hold it there.

The concentration remains, but the effort that was needed to maintain it starts to fall away. With that, a certain tension also disappears — first the obvious effort of concentrating, then increasingly subtle movements involved in maintaining oneself as the meditator.

The direction is not toward concentrating harder and harder. It is toward such complete stability that effort is no longer necessary.

There is less tension, then still less, until there is nothing that needs to be held.

Meditation becomes effortless.

This is where the movement into samādhi begins.

As concentration becomes complete, effort can fall away. What remains is one-pointedness without tension.

From concentration into samādhi

Patañjali describes this deepening through dhāraṇā, dhyāna and samādhi.

In dhāraṇā, attention is intentionally placed upon an object and kept there. In dhyāna, this becomes continuous: attention no longer repeatedly leaves the object and returns.

Samādhi is the further deepening of the same process.

Patañjali describes it as a state in which the object alone shines forth, as though the mind were empty of its own form.

This becomes easier to understand when we look at what happens to effort.

As long as I am maintaining concentration, there is still a subtle relationship: I am here, concentrating on this.

When concentration no longer requires effort, that structure begins to loosen. The sense of oneself as the person maintaining the meditation becomes less prominent. There is no need to correct attention, bring it back or keep the process going.

The object remains.

Attention remains.

But the tension between the meditator and the object diminishes.

At a certain depth, it no longer feels like observing the object from outside. There is a complete absorption into it.

This is samādhi with an object.

What happens as tension disappears?

This process can go considerably deeper than physical relaxation.

At first we may become aware of tensions in the body. As these settle, subtler movements become noticeable: emotional reactions, expectation, thought, the tendency to follow sensations, even the very subtle effort of directing attention.

Normally these movements are so constant that we do not experience them as tension. They simply form our ordinary state.

In deep meditation, they become perceptible precisely because everything else is becoming quieter.

Eventually there is no need to suppress them. Attention has become so stable that it is no longer carried away by them.

The senses also begin to recede. A sound does not necessarily disappear, but consciousness no longer moves toward it. The body can cease to occupy the field of awareness. Thought is not being forcibly stopped; there is simply no movement that requires thought to continue.

Layer by layer, what normally creates movement and tension becomes still.

Yet awareness does not become dull.

This is one of the important distinctions between samādhi and sleep or trance: activity decreases while clarity remains.

There can be profound stillness without unconsciousness.

And there can be complete absence of tension without loss of awareness.

Entering the object

In samādhi with an object, something still remains as the focus or support of meditation.

But the way it is known changes.

Ordinarily, we know through many layers at once. We recognize, name, remember, compare and interpret. Even when attention is stable, these subtle activities of citta can remain.

Patañjali describes increasingly refined samādhis in which these layers become quiet. This is the context of distinctions such as savitarka and nirvitarka, and later savicāra and nirvicāra.

The details become subtle, but the direction is clear.

Less and less stands between consciousness and the object.

The practitioner is no longer thinking about it or observing it through the usual activity of the mind. There is an increasingly complete entering into the object itself.

This is why samādhi is also connected with direct knowledge.

Patañjali later brings dhāraṇā, dhyāna and samādhi together as saṃyama. When this capacity is applied to an object, increasingly subtle aspects of that object can become directly knowable.

The stillness of samādhi is therefore not an end in itself. It changes what can be known and how knowing takes place.

When there is no longer an object

And then there is another possibility.

As long as an object remains, however subtle, meditation still has a support. Consciousness is still absorbed in something.

Patañjali's path also describes the movement beyond this, ultimately toward nirbīja samādhi — seedless samādhi.

Here even the object falls away.

There is nothing left to concentrate upon and therefore nothing to maintain. There is no movement toward an object, no need to hold attention in a particular direction.

The senses no longer structure the experience. The ordinary movements of mind are absent. Even the subtle tension created by the relationship between meditator and object is gone.

There is no tension because there is nothing left that needs to be held.

Yet this is not unconsciousness.

There is no object, but consciousness is not lost.

This is where language becomes difficult. If we describe darkness, emptiness, space, light or bliss, we have already introduced something that can be experienced — an object.

Objectless samādhi is not an experience of emptiness.

It points toward complete stillness without an object: no sensory content to follow, no mental content to engage with, no meditative object to enter and no effort required to sustain the state.

In experiential language, we might describe it as resting in pure consciousness, without an object and without tension.

But even this is only a pointer. It is not something that can be accurately imagined beforehand.

With an object, samādhi is complete absorption into what is contemplated. Without an object, even this final support disappears.

What remains when everything becomes still?

This brings us back to the opening of the Yoga Sūtras:

Yogaś citta-vṛtti-nirodhaḥ — yoga is the stilling of the movements of citta.

Tadā draṣṭuḥ svarūpe 'vasthānam — then the Seer abides in its own nature.

These statements are not merely philosophical definitions. They describe the direction of practice.

At first, attention is scattered among many movements.

Then it becomes one-pointed.

One-pointedness becomes continuous.

As stability increases, effort becomes unnecessary and tension falls away.

With an object, this opens into complete absorption. As samādhi deepens, even increasingly subtle movements of citta become still.

And beyond the object, there is no longer anything toward which consciousness needs to move.

This is also why Patañjali distinguishes puruṣa, the Seer, from everything that can become an object of experience.

The body can be experienced. Thought can be experienced. Bliss can be experienced. Silence can be experienced. Even extremely subtle states of meditation can be experienced.

The deeper question is: what knows them?

Samādhi takes this question out of philosophy and into direct investigation.

As the movements of citta become still, the distinction between what appears in experience and that which knows experience can become increasingly clear.

This is why samādhi has such a central place in Patañjali's path toward viveka and ultimately kaivalya.

It is not simply an extraordinary meditative state to attain.

It is what becomes possible when attention no longer moves, effort is no longer needed and the tensions that normally structure our experience have become still.

With an object, there is complete absorption.

Without an object, even that final relationship falls away.

And what remains cannot finally be understood through a description.

It has to be known directly.

Explore Patañjali Yoga

At Lilleoru, the Yoga Sūtras are studied with Acharya Ishwaranand through commentary, meditation and direct exploration of the inner processes described by Patañjali.

Explore Patañjali Yoga →